Circle's CEO Justifies USDC Freeze Policy Amid Rising Criticism

By Patricia Miller

Apr 13, 2026

2 min read

Circle's CEO defends USDC freeze policy, emphasizing legal obligations amidst scrutiny from recent crypto thefts.

Circle Internet's CEO recently clarified the company's stance on USDC freezes, emphasizing that actions are only taken under legal obligation. Speaking from Seoul, he explained that Circle views USDC as a regulated financial product, strictly adhering to the rule of law. This statement directly responds to mounting criticism regarding the company's perceived delays during a recent exploit involving the Drift Protocol.

He elaborated that Circle is committed to acting solely on court or law enforcement direction, underlining that freeze actions are not random but must follow a specific legal framework. This approach aims to prevent decisions made in haste due to public pressure, ensuring that the integrity of the regulated financial system is maintained.

In light of the recent theft of approximately $285 million from the Drift Protocol, which involved significant USDC losses, scrutiny of Circle's procedures has intensified. The attack is believed to be linked to North Korean actors and prompted many to question whether Circle could have intervened more swiftly. Analysts noted that the attacker moved USDC across multiple chains, leaving an opportunity where assets could have been frozen before further laundering occurred.

Onchain investigator ZachXBT raised concerns about Circle's reluctance to immediately freeze wallets, suggesting it has led to significant illicit USDC flows since 2022. He cited various incidents where stolen funds remained unaddressed for extended periods. As Circle navigates through these challenges, they advocate for Congress to advance legislation that would provide clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers on intervention protocols.

The push for clarity comes as stablecoin regulation becomes a pressing topic among lawmakers, especially regarding how companies can act during critical incidents. Circle's insistence on following legal procedures highlights an important discussion in the cryptocurrency landscape about the balance between regulatory compliance and the immediate need for action in the face of financial crimes.

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.